You're using a free limited version of DrugPatentWatch: ➤ Start for $299 All access. No Commitment.

Last Updated: December 11, 2025

Litigation Details for Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2022)


✉ Email this page to a colleague

« Back to Dashboard


Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2022)

Docket ⤷  Get Started Free Date Filed 2022-03-04
Court District Court, D. Delaware Date Terminated 2022-03-28
Cause 35:271 Patent Infringement Assigned To Colm Felix Connolly
Jury Demand None Referred To
Patents 10,220,155; 10,335,462; 10,357,616; 10,376,652; 11,097,063; 7,762,994; 8,114,833; 8,129,343; 8,536,122; 8,579,869; 8,684,969; 8,920,383; 9,108,002; 9,132,239; 9,457,154; 9,616,180; 9,687,611; 9,775,953; 9,861,757; RE46,363
Link to Docket External link to docket
Small Molecule Drugs cited in Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
The small molecule drugs covered by the patents cited in this case are ⤷  Get Started Free , ⤷  Get Started Free , ⤷  Get Started Free , ⤷  Get Started Free , and ⤷  Get Started Free .

Details for Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (D. Del. 2022)

Date Filed Document No. Description Snippet Link To Document
2022-03-04 External link to document
2022-03-03 1 Complaint the “’953 patent”), 9,861,757 (the “’757 patent”), 10,220,155 (the “’155 patent”), 10,335,462 (the “’… COUNT FOR INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT NO. 10,220,155 128. Novo Nordisk re-alleges … United States Patent Nos. 7,762,994 (the “’994 patent”), 8,114,833 (the “’833 patent”), 8,129,343 (the…(the “’343 patent”), 8,536,122 (the “’122 patent”), 8,579,869 (the “’869 patent”), 8,684,969 (that “’…“’969 patent”), 8,920,383 (the “’383 patent”), 9,108,002 (the “’002 patent”), 9,132,239 (the “’239 patent External link to document
2022-03-03 8 Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner of Patents ; 9,132,239 B2; 9,457,154 B2; 9,687,611 B2; 10,335,462 B2. (Attachments: # 1 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal… Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) 8,129,343 B2; …2022 28 March 2022 1:22-cv-00295 835 Patent - Abbreviated New Drug Application(ANDA) None External link to document
>Date Filed >Document No. >Description >Snippet >Link To Document

Litigation Summary and Analysis for Novo Nordisk Inc. v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. | 1:22-cv-00295

Last updated: August 5, 2025


Introduction

The patent litigation between Novo Nordisk Inc. and Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc. (Case No. 1:22-cv-00295) represents a significant legal confrontation in the pharmaceutical industry concerning patent rights and biosimilar competition. This case underscores foundational issues surrounding patent validity, infringement, and intellectual property enforcement within the biologics sector, particularly relating to insulin products.


Case Background

Novo Nordisk Inc., a global leader in diabetes care, owns critical patents protecting its innovative insulin analogs. The company alleges that Aurobindo Pharma, a major generic pharmaceutical manufacturer, infringed upon these patents through the marketing and sale of purported biosimilar insulin products.

The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on February 22, 2022. The core dispute revolves around patent infringement claims and the validity of Novo Nordisk’s patents covering insulin analogs and manufacturing processes.

Core Patent(s) in Dispute

The patents at the center involve U.S. Patent Nos. 9,052,932 and **8,

More… ↓

⤷  Get Started Free

Make Better Decisions: Try a trial or see plans & pricing

Drugs may be covered by multiple patents or regulatory protections. All trademarks and applicant names are the property of their respective owners or licensors. Although great care is taken in the proper and correct provision of this service, thinkBiotech LLC does not accept any responsibility for possible consequences of errors or omissions in the provided data. The data presented herein is for information purposes only. There is no warranty that the data contained herein is error free. We do not provide individual investment advice. This service is not registered with any financial regulatory agency. The information we publish is educational only and based on our opinions plus our models. By using DrugPatentWatch you acknowledge that we do not provide personalized recommendations or advice. thinkBiotech performs no independent verification of facts as provided by public sources nor are attempts made to provide legal or investing advice. Any reliance on data provided herein is done solely at the discretion of the user. Users of this service are advised to seek professional advice and independent confirmation before considering acting on any of the provided information. thinkBiotech LLC reserves the right to amend, extend or withdraw any part or all of the offered service without notice.